<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/2/22 10:05, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXrM0H2C8Dy=dxEJq64157rGpXRY95Dtth6V=mUY9LNU8A@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br clear="all">
<div>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 19:32,
<<a href="mailto:osm.talk-au@thorsten.engler.id.au"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">osm.talk-au@thorsten.engler.id.au</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;" lang="EN-AU">
<div class="gmail-m_-8413090626355741212WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>I assume these National parks
where different rules are in effect have a boundary
relation.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>In which case it would be
possible to either:</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>a) tag a def: directly on
that boundary relation with the rules that apply<br>
or (maybe better in this case)<br>
b) create a type=defaults relation “Tasmania
National Parks Defaults” with all the defaults that
apply in national parks, then add that relation to
any national park boundary relation where it applies
as member with the role of defaults<br>
<br>
(b) is basically following the defaults proposal
exactly, and allows to define the defaults once and
the re-use them for all national parks.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>A problem with that would be that in a number of cases
that I know of, you can ride a bike along the roads <i>into</i>
the National Park, but you can't then take your bike onto
the walking tracks, so a Park-wide default may not work?</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Around me .. it varies. While there are 'general rules' (that I'd
term 'a guide') the on the ground situation is confusing to say
the least! <br>
</p>
<p>The tracks - wide enough for a 4WD seem to be open for MTBs.. but
paths - not wide enough for 4WDs are closed to MTBs... that is not
the situation in all National Parks, and in some National Parks
only some tracks are open while others are closed. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Personally I'll continue to tag them individually ... <br>
</p>
<br>
</body>
</html>