<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/2/22 12:29, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXpuuPg5_dTQCWCukfwFvg6vSKdJn0AP+MxtfnBXXPm4OQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br clear="all">
<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 09:50,
Andrew Harvey <<a href="mailto:andrew.harvey4@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">andrew.harvey4@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">I think either awtgs= or hiking_scale:awtgs=
are fine, I'd say just pick one and start a wiki page
describing the tag and how it's used.</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Personally, I like awtgs=*.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I prefer hiking_scale:awtgs= as you know that it is a hiking
scale .. even if you don't know what awtgs is. <br>
</p>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXpuuPg5_dTQCWCukfwFvg6vSKdJn0AP+MxtfnBXXPm4OQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div> <br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>As I raised before I'm still not sure about how it
would apply to individual ways vs route relations and if
it's only tagged based on officially assigned values or
if mappers can evaluate and decide the value on their
own.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
Looking at those guidelines, it's up to each Council /
Organisation to work out the value by the "worst" feature of
any particular track, so I'd think we could do the same -
follow the guidelines then designate this track as "Grade 3"?</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>+1</p>
<p>The individual ways carry the worst rating for that way ... this
would allow selection of ways that are within capability by simply
removing those above the required level. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>Routes are a different problem .... while the worst one could be
included .. what happens if/when things change? Possibly better to
leave it off? Consider that some routes have alternatives,
excursions... <br>
</p>
</body>
</html>