<div dir="ltr">Going by <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered</a> and <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter</a> I would say yes.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 at 14:31, Mat Attlee <<a href="mailto:mattattlee@gmail.com">mattattlee@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto">Whilst surveying around Sydney I've noticed that many bus stops are already tagged as having a shelter. However many of these don't have a dedicated bus shelter though they are covered by a roof from an adjacent building. Would it be better to tag them as shelter=no and covered=yes? </div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-au mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-au@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au</a><br>
</blockquote></div>