<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-AU" link="blue" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">And also, if you really look hard enough into it, you will realise those crosses at intersections do not break any OSM rules or policys. The no physical divide argument is not valid because they do not represent two different
roads, this person is reverting edits he really knows nothing about.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Dean Scott <deanscott775@outlook.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, May 2, 2022 11:03:51 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Anthony Panozzo <panozz@outlook.com>; talk-au@openstreetmap.org <talk-au@openstreetmap.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<style>
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math"}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri}
p.x_MsoNormal, li.x_MsoNormal, div.x_MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif}
a:link, span.x_MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline}
span.x_EmailStyle18
{font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext}
.x_MsoChpDefault
{font-size:10.0pt}
@page WordSection1
{margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt}
div.x_WordSection1
{}
-->
</style>
<div lang="EN-AU" link="blue" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="x_WordSection1">
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="">Hi, what section of road has TheSwavu allowed u-turns? If you are referring to the intersection with traffic lights, the u-turn’s are correctly tagged. If not, please point it out to us so we can better understand<br>
<br>
Regards,</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style="">Scottie0001</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style=""> </span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span style=""> </span></p>
<div style="border:none; border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt; padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="x_MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt; color:black">Anthony Panozzo <panozz@outlook.com><br>
<b>Date: </b>Monday, 2 May 2022 at 10:57 pm<br>
<b>To: </b>talk-au@openstreetmap.org <talk-au@openstreetmap.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [talk-au] Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3</span></p>
</div>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">Reporting user </span><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheSwavu">TheSwavu | OpenStreetMap</a></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">2 hours ago he made this changeset <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120456255#map=17/-34.75536/138.63155">
Changeset: 120456255 | OpenStreetMap</a> he has allowed u-turns</p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
<div class="x_MsoNormal" align="center" style="text-align:center">
<hr size="0" width="100%" align="center">
</div>
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg">
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:black">From:</span></b><span style="color:black"> talk-au-request@openstreetmap.org <talk-au-request@openstreetmap.org><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, May 2, 2022 8:30:24 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> talk-au@openstreetmap.org <talk-au@openstreetmap.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3</span> </p>
<div>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="x_MsoNormal">Send Talk-au mailing list submissions to<br>
talk-au@openstreetmap.org<br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
talk-au-request@openstreetmap.org<br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
talk-au-owner@openstreetmap.org<br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of Talk-au digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Re: New OSM Discourse site: community.osm.org (Sam Wilson)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2022 11:01:40 +0800<br>
From: Sam Wilson <sam@samwilson.id.au><br>
To: Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1@gmail.com><br>
Cc: OSM-Au <talk-au@openstreetmap.org><br>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] New OSM Discourse site: community.osm.org<br>
Message-ID: <2f617c9d-0456-971b-233c-90d2e54ead58@samwilson.id.au><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"<br>
<br>
It's growing in use, I think (not with Australia-specific discussion).<br>
<br>
It feels like a pretty good site, I check the headlines most days, and I <br>
think one advantage is being able to get a feel for what's being <br>
discussed elsewhere. Also to have location-specific discussions that <br>
benefit either from the input of people elsewhere or to let other people <br>
know how one place is doing things.<br>
<br>
I don't like the notification system that much, but part of that is I <br>
think that the ratio of meta posts to real topical ones is quite large <br>
at the moment. It is decreasing though, as more people take part.<br>
<br>
?Sam<br>
<br>
<br>
On 1/5/22 06:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:<br>
> So how's it going after this first month?<br>
><br>
> Any marked advantages / disadvantages over the existing mailing list?<br>
><br>
> Thanks<br>
><br>
> Graeme<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 12:52, Sam Wilson <sam@samwilson.id.au> wrote:<br>
><br>
> The new community.openstreetmap.org<br>
> <<a href="https://community.openstreetmap.org">https://community.openstreetmap.org</a>> site is up and running.<br>
><br>
> It's going to replace the old forum, including the users:<br>
> Australia <<a href="https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=24">https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=24</a>><br>
> subforum.<br>
><br>
> I'm not sure if we should ask for an Australia category to be<br>
> created on the new site. Probably not worth it until there's some<br>
> amount of content relating to Australia.<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-au mailing list<br>
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org<br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au</a><br>
><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220502/dda3550a/attachment-0001.htm">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20220502/dda3550a/attachment-0001.htm</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-au mailing list<br>
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org<br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of Talk-au Digest, Vol 179, Issue 3<br>
***************************************</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>