<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text Char";
margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.PlainTextChar
{mso-style-name:"Plain Text Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"Plain Text";
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-AU link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Tony,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I’m wondering about the usefulness of adding foot=yes to highway=path and highway=track.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I have never done this because I thought it would be assumed that pedestrians (and cyclists) can use paths and tracks ?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>In WA, where people have (in my opinion) wrongly classified a path as a footpath (and hence excluded bicycles), I have often changed it to a path, but never tagged foot=yes and/or bicycle=yes.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Ian<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:55:42 +1000<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>From: <a href="mailto:forster@ozonline.com.au">forster@ozonline.com.au</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>To: <a href="mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org">talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>Subject: [talk-au] Australian Tagging Guidelines Footpath Cycling<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>Hi<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>I have edited<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Footpath_Cycling">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Footpath_Cycling</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>(1) to record the different international English uses of footpath, pavement and sidewalk<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>(2) to give photographic examples as a base for discussion.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>Not intending to redefine anything, sorry if anything is controversial.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoPlainText>>Tony<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>