<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 14:05, OSM via Talk-au <<a href="mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk-au@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Since the coastline tag is also
supposed to represent the high water mark then I would say that
they should be snapped together (since they then represent the
same feature - that is, the high water mark). This would mean that
the boundary data already in OSM from the government basemaps
would just be their own mapping of the high water mark, and
probably be less up to date or refined as our own.</p></div></blockquote><div>Exactly. So if anything we should be actively snapping them.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><p>This is my first time responding on talk-au, lmk if I've messed up
any formatting to link to the original question.<br></p></div></blockquote><div>It's come through but as a new thread, and for some reason from talk-au instead of from you and via talk-au.</div></div></div>