<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/7/24 12:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAP4zaXr_VwVFHqgiWLk_vx6B_88OmVY0zRzAQrMgscejkE1DCw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 at
14:58, Alex Sims <<a href="mailto:alex@softgrow.com"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">alex@softgrow.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div class="msg2151330161154166430">
<div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;" lang="EN-AU">
<div class="m_-1648771036232571351WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt">At
the moment the relation is a collection of nodes,
but really they are areas, possibly not well
defined, but certainly large enough to put a tent
up in. I’d be changing the nodes to areas which
would make sense and then a multipolygon to join
them all together. </span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thanks, Alex</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I thought about areas as well, but they aren't defined,
so thought that may be messy?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>& will an MP work when the 4 sites are spread over
several km?</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 at
18:09, Warin <<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>This collection looks to be operated by the same firm
.. but each site has a different name ... and different
facilities... <br>
</p>
<p>So I'd delete the site relation, put the operator tags
on each campsite. <br>
</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>Yes, but while each individual site has its own name, the
4 of them together make up "Wee Jasper Campground", so that
should be shown somewhere, shouldn't it?</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I think that the 4 together make up[ the 'Wee Jasper CampgroundS'
... Quote "There are few places left as naturally and untouched
as Reflections Wee Jasper campgrounds" ..</p>
<p>Yes I know they use "Wee Jasper Campground" as well ... but logic
suggests campgrounds as there are more than one campground, the
collection is geographic and administrative. <br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>The NSW state government calls them 'Wee Jasper Reserves'
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.nsw.gov.au/visiting-and-exploring-nsw/locations-and-attractions/wee-jasper-reserves">https://www.nsw.gov.au/visiting-and-exploring-nsw/locations-and-attractions/wee-jasper-reserves</a></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I do think these are council properties with a 'commercial'
interest handling it for the local council.. thus an operator.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>By using the tag 'name' in the relation the individual member get
that name .. but thye each already have a name .. catch 22. <br>
</p>
</body>
</html>