<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/11/24 09:55,
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:forster@ozonline.com.au">forster@ozonline.com.au</a> wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:20241125095553.dfparh4q3kgsk0c4@horde-2.ozonline.com.au">Quoting
      Andrew Harvey <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:andrew.harvey4@gmail.com"><andrew.harvey4@gmail.com></a>:
      <br>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">I'd consider using <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="abandoned:highway=track">abandoned:highway=track</a>
        + highway=footway/path
        <br>
        <br>
        <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="abandoned:*=*">abandoned:*=*</a>
        <br>
        Still visible but fallen into serious disrepair and which could
        only be put
        <br>
        back into operation with considerable effort
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      Hi all, I know I am getting close to suggesting tagging for the
      renderer but I am inclined to keep similar lifecycle tags for
      those cases where the land manager requests that the track not be
      rendered and the land manager is working actively to maintain a
      state of abandoned:
      <br>
      <br>
      Consider the case of a vehicle track which is impassible to
      vehicles but traffic-able to walkers. It could be tagged
      <br>
      <br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="abandoned:highway=track">abandoned:highway=track</a> or
      <br>
      highway=path
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <u><br>
    </u>Think you mean, at least this is what I'd be using <br>
    <br>
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="abandoned:highway=track">abandoned:highway=track</a> and<br>
    highway=path<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:20241125095553.dfparh4q3kgsk0c4@horde-2.ozonline.com.au">
      <br>
      If there are lots of <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="abandoned:highway">abandoned:highway</a> which are traffic-able by
      walkers and not access=no, it is just incentive for renderers to
      render abandoned:
      <br>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Most would take the major tag of highway=track and ignore <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="was:*">was:*</a> or
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="abandoned:*">abandoned:*</a>. Only if the 'lessor' tag of <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="abandoned:*">abandoned:*</a> (or <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="disused:*">disused:*</a>
    etc) existed by itself would someone consider rendering it. <br>
  </body>
</html>