<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
<br><br>I think I did. I think it serves no purpose, also, it was connected wrong on most <br>of the junctions. After reading a bit, I found a page (from Ben?) that describes it<br>not being a good idea do to so. <br><br>I also think it should never ne drawn seperate, as, "logically" it's the same road, <br>"fysically" it's just seperate built there for the purpose of it being a very dangerous <br>road, and to provide some form of protection to cyclists.<br><br>Tim<br><br><br>> <br>> I think I was a little bit to fast.<br>> <br>> It is about http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=51.0466&lon=5.0184&zoom=13<br>> <br>> The street is called Diestsebaan between Diest and Veerle-Laakdal. The<br>> way is also tagged as cycleway. Because I use josm the way was drawn as<br>> a cycleway. In the online editor everything looks correct.<br>> <br>> Is it not better to have a seperate way as lane for bikes ? If I am not<br>> mistaken the lane is seperated from the road by trees, but I am not sure<br>> there.<br>> <br>> kind regards,<br>> Bart<br>> <br>> Ben Laenen schreef:<br>> > Bart Vanherck wrote:<br>> >> Hello,<br>> >><br>> >> Someone did made a cycleway of the way between Diest and Geel. Is there<br>> >> a reason for that ?<br>> > <br>> > Which way do you mean exactly? I can't find anything wrong.<br>> > <br>> > Ben<br>> > <br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> Talk-be mailing list<br>> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org<br>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be<br> <br /><hr />Windows 7: stream eenvoudig je muziek. <a href='http://windows.microsoft.com/windows-7' target='_new'>Ontdek hoe.</a></body>
</html>