<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/8/10 Maarten Deen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mdeen@xs4all.nl">mdeen@xs4all.nl</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:56:28 +0200, Ivo De Broeck<br>
<div class="im"><<a href="mailto:ivo.debroeck@gmail.com">ivo.debroeck@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div><div class="im">> What i propose is keeping the existing relation for the "normal"<br>
> direction.<br>
<br>
</div>There is no "normal" direction with buses.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes the "normal" name for the route is "8 Bertem- Leuven - Bierbeek"</div><div>On relation one are busses with : 8 BIERBEEK</div>
<div>On relation two are busses with : 8 BERTEM</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
> Example stadsbus nr 8 go from Bertem - Leuven - Bierbeek (check the<br>
> relation with the relation checker). Give the same relationnumber to<br>
> all bus-stops for that direction.<br>
<br>
</div>You mean: add the stops to the relation.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> If you are in Leuven you can choose the bus 8 to Bierbeek (relation<br>
> one) OR bus 8 to Bertem (relation 2).<br>
<br>
</div>And there comes the part for the "from" and "to" tags in the relation<br>
which I thought had no use. You always "take line X towards Y". And<br>
having the from and to in the relation will specify Y.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Right, there are no tags forward or backward. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
Oh, and<br>
<<a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Oxomoa/Public_transport_schema" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Oxomoa/Public_transport_schema</a>><br>
has a more elaborate tagging scheme.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We need now, a working convention for busses. </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
Regards,<br>
Maarten<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> 2010/8/10 Renaud MICHEL<br>
</div><div class="im">> Le mardi 10 août 2010 à 10:22, Tim Francois a écrit :<br>
><br>
>> +1. Yup, this is what is currently happening in most of the UK - a<br>
> > separate relation for the 'up' and 'down' bus routes, so that<br>
> > forwards/backwards (which is kinda broken as a concept in this<br>
> case)<br>
> > is not required!<br>
><br>
> I'm interested, for now I have created single relation for a bus<br>
> route in<br>
> Liège.<br>
> How should I tag the two separate relations?<br>
><br>
> The page<br>
</div>> <a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses</a> [2]<br>
<div class="im">> doesn't talk about double relation, but suggests that bus_stop<br>
> should be put<br>
> on the way, but the bus stops are not on the road but along it.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Renaud Michel<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-be mailing list<br>
</div>> <a href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a> [3]<br>
> <a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a> [4]<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-be mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Ivo De Broeck<br>Valleilaan 13<br>3360 Korbeek-lo<br>Tel (0)16 43 84 93<br>Gsm +32 486 17 61 13<br>