<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Renaud MICHEL wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid201107111224.54632.r.h.michel+osm@gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">On lundi 11 juillet 2011 at 12:22, Gerard Vanderveken wrote :
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">- When you start drawing a way somewhere in a node, JOSM always assumes
you want to continue some way already present.
This is very annoying and unproductive, because this is nearly always
not what you wanted or intended.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Press Ctrl while clicking on the end note, JOSM will start a new way.</pre>
</blockquote>
No, this leads to a double node and the way is not connected to the
crossing.<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid201107111224.54632.r.h.michel+osm@gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">
You can also start your new way at the second node, and then connect it to
the end of the other way.</pre>
</blockquote>
I think I've seen JOSM doing a continuation that way to, but it
doesn't seem to happen in the example node.<br>
However when you need to make a way between two crossings, it can come
from either side.<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid201107111224.54632.r.h.michel+osm@gmail.com">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">- When you split a way, the old id (and by consequence its history) are
always in the first part, and the second part gets a new id.
This way the history and id can be left by the smallest part. It should
always assigned to the biggest part.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
For that, I temporarily reverse the way to have the history on the good
part, then reverse both part back (but this is only important for ways where
the orientation matters, like oneways or rivers).
</pre>
</blockquote>
That's what i try to do, when paying attention to it, but I feel JOSM
should do it automatically.<br>
</body>
</html>