<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>
The wiki about the highway conventions distinguishes primairy, secondary and tertiairy roads using the N-numbers (although there are some question marks). Using the current conventions means using the old classification when the N-numbers were given. Various N-ways got reconstructed, the traffic got redirected by other roads, some roads aren't suitable anymore for the current traffic.<BR>
<BR>
The <FONT lang=en _mstSrcHtml="ruimtelijk structuurplan vlaanderen" _mstHash="1091831">spatial structure plan for Flanders</FONT> (ruimtelijk structuurplan Vlaanderen) has a list with the primairy roads [pages 368-377 <A href="http://www2.vlaanderen.be/ruimtelijk/docs/rsv2011/RSV2011.pdf">http://www2.vlaanderen.be/ruimtelijk/docs/rsv2011/RSV2011.pdf</A>]. I suggest to adjust the wiki so there will be an uniform highway classification where primairy roads are the roads selected in the structure plan. The other N-roads can be describes as secondary roads. Tertiary roads can be described as other important local roads (nl: steenwegen die geen secundaire weg zijn). Minor or residential roads can be understand as local roads (nl: lokale wegen). What do you think?<BR>
<BR>
I suppose that there are also conventions for the Walloon area.<BR>
<BR>
Kevin<BR>
<BR> </div></body>
</html>