<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013-03-24 00:45, André Pirard Papou
wrote :<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:514E3E7D.4010704@gmail.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013-03-22 21:32, Marc Gemis wrote
:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJKJX-SkJMq8r066f0J+bt3XKXHTD5oBtc5BJhzj4KbJh=SerA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">This is the reply I got on my "bug report" to
osmose.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Do we have to locate those ways with route=bicycle ?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>m<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
It makes no sense.<br>
route=bicycle is a tag for a relation, not for a way.<br>
It's very surprising that Osmose commands to repeat such a tag on
ever cycling way !!!<br>
How could we identify a cycling route if all the cycling ways
contained route=bicycle ????????
<div><br>
Either Osmose removes that test.<br>
Or the authors remove that tag (I bcc: one of them).<br>
Or I can remove 28 of them that I have ready after my selection.<br>
<br>
Your choice?<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I completely change my mind.<br>
route= on a way can be ambiguous (in case of multiple routes knowing
and where they go at junctions) and the better place for it is in a
relation, in which case it's optional and not very useful on the
way.<br>
But it is not invalid and there's no compelling reason to remove
them.<br>
<br>
What is incredibly surprising is that Osmose commands to add route=
on ways where there is no route.<br>
Osmose should remove those warning urgently.<br>
<br>
In the meantime, flick them away with a "false positive".<br>
<br>
Cheers, <br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:514E3E7D.4010704@gmail.com" type="cite">
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJKJX-SkJMq8r066f0J+bt3XKXHTD5oBtc5BJhzj4KbJh=SerA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">---------- Forwarded message
----------<br>
From: <b class="gmail_sendername">frodrigo</b> <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:notifications@github.com">notifications@github.com</a>></span><br>
Date: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 9:12 PM<br>
Subject: Re: [osmose-backend] Missing Parent Tag for all
highways with bicycle = yes (#1)<br>
To: osm-fr/osmose-backend <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:osmose-backend@noreply.github.com">osmose-backend@noreply.github.com</a>><br>
Cc: marcgemis <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:marc.gemis@gmail.com">marc.gemis@gmail.com</a>><br>
<br>
<br>
<p>"Missing parent tag" is a statistical analysis. Osmose
suggest to add route=bicycle because this tag value is
already a key as bicycle=yes, and more over because
there is more than 50 ways with route=bicycle +
bicycle=yes in Belgium.</p>
<p>Maybe we need to apply this analysis on relative value
inside of just 50.</p>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>