<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div><div>Hi Anton,<br><br></div>Thanks for joining the fun game of integrating Urbis :) ..<br>the more player we are , the more fun it will be ;-)<br><br></div>So, i've quickly check you first changeset ... it seems good for me ...a few remarks <span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span class="">though :<br>
</span></span></div><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span class="">- It might be easier for you to copy past the relation instead of recreating one (see here <a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2013-May/004054.html">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2013-May/004054.html</a> )<br>
</span></span></div><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span class="">(if you don't understand i'll try to record a small vidz to see how i do it...)<br></span></span></div><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span class="">- You may want to add the addr:postcode to the relation as well (if you copy past it it's already there ;) )<br>
</span></span></div><div><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span class="">- Personnaly .. but personnaly only, i'm not fan of source=* on the tag/way ... you end up with a whole bunch of thing you don't know how to manage ... but it can stay there...<br>
<br></span></span></div><div><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span class="">Don't forget to add the street to the relation...(with role=street) ==> you can see almost any street of Jette to watch how it's done...<br>
<br></span></span></div><div><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span class="">And for the second problem, do not hesitate to put both streets side in the relation (as long as they have the same name, same post code, ... )<br>
<br></span></span></div><div><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span class="">Regards<br><br></span></span></div><span id="result_box" class="" lang="en"><span class=""></span></span></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Anton Snoeys <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:antonsnoeys@gmail.com" target="_blank">antonsnoeys@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Hi everybody,<div><br></div><div>I'm new to this and found your work, thumbs up guys :-)</div><div>I recently tried to use the 1030.osm to add information for Schaarbeek in JOSM.</div><div>I'm struggling a bit with the AssociatedStreet relations. Yesterday I added Rue Henri Evenepoel (<span style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Arial,sans-serif;line-height:32px">Changeset: 16425586)</span>, could anybody please check if I added the information the right way? I woudn't want to continue adding wrong or incomplete information.</div>
<div>Today I tried to add Place de la Patrie (<font>Changeset 16434542)</font> but I couldn't add both sides of the square to the same relation (probably because the square is just two one way roads?).</div><div>
Sorry to bother you guys with it,</div><div>Cheers,</div><div>FantAntonio</div></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Nicolas Pettiaux <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nicolas@pettiaux.be" target="_blank">nicolas@pettiaux.be</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">2013/6/5 Pierre Parmentier <<a href="mailto:pierrecparmentier@gmail.com" target="_blank">pierrecparmentier@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div><div>> Hi,<br>
><br>
> We can observe that where 'UrbIS' shows sometimes multiple streetnumbers on<br>
> a particular building way, 'CadGIS Viewer Grand Public' is quite better (and<br>
> univocal).<br>
<br>
</div></div>Thanks for giving the link to this CadGIS viewer that I did not know.<br>
<br>
You affirmation is strange to me. I thought that there was Urbis was<br>
the reference in Brussels and that is was used by the cadaster !<br>
<br>
I have just checked on<br>
<a href="http://www.cirb.irisnet.be/fr/catalogue-de-services/urbis" target="_blank">http://www.cirb.irisnet.be/fr/catalogue-de-services/urbis</a><br>
and I realize that there are different Urbis products. THe one that is<br>
referenced<br>
<br>
I suppose that UrbIS-Map is used on the link that Pierre gives, while UrbIS-P&B<br>
is related to the cadaster data.<br>
<br>
There must be some good explanation why these sets of data are<br>
different, but I also wonder if it would not be interesting if they<br>
where only different views of the same datas.<br>
<br>
Has anyone more information about these ?<br>
<br>
This may be a question to ask to the person who will preent Urbis<br>
during the rmll<br>
<br>
<a href="http://schedule2013.rmll.info/programme/les-donnees-ouvertes/participation-citoyenne-et/article/donnees-urbis-brussels-donnees" target="_blank">http://schedule2013.rmll.info/programme/les-donnees-ouvertes/participation-citoyenne-et/article/donnees-urbis-brussels-donnees</a><br>
<br>
on Monday July 8<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Nicolas<br>
<span><font color="#888888">--<br>
Nicolas Pettiaux, dr. sc<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-be mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a><br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-be mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>