<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Kurt (a.o),<br>
<br>
I checked the Rotselaar/Werchter setup and I made a single change to
the Rotselaar relation:<br>
<br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/214462">http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/214462</a><br>
<br>
The only thing I think was missing is adding the Werchter boundary
relation as a 'subarea' to the Rotselaar one.<br>
<br>
Did the same setup for Rijmenam/Bonheiden. There aren't many
'fusiegemeentes' being mapped -unfortunately- although it would be
highly interesting to have them, not only from a nominatim (search)
point of view, but also for addressing in general.<br>
<br>
The change I made will probably trigger some changes in the
nominatim search result in a few days , I now expect that Leuven
will be replaced by Rotselaar in the search result set when looking
up Werchter in a few days.<br>
<br>
regards,<br>
<br>
Glenn<br>
</body>
</html>