<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013-10-18 08:38, marc bessieres
wrote :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CACo3+QZpH65RsiDYQUJqujk8Hf=BUbeoyTLG+ObJAJbYahaq0A@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p dir="ltr"><br>
Le 17 oct. 2013 22:56, "André Pirard" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:A.Pirard.Papou@gmail.com">A.Pirard.Papou@gmail.com</a>>
a écrit :<br>
><br>
> On 2013-10-17 21:19, marc bessieres wrote :<br>
<br>
>> 4) In OSM inspector I see that way_id : 233946835 is
reported as error because it has no tags. I see that it is the
inside of a school. I thought of creating a multipolygon with
the external border and this way as the internal border, is this
the right way?<br>
><br>
> It looks like the outside is drawn twice, of which the one
sharing the walls with the houses seems to come from Urbis.<br>
> Simple way: you may tag the interior with the same name of
the school. Not sure about adding leisure=playground inside.<br>
> Harder way: Relation:multipolygon with roles outer and
inner for each wall.<br>
> In that case, the tags are put in the relation and the
walls can have no tags.<br>
></p>
<p dir="ltr">Thank you, I didn't notice. Should I remove the
import from urbis or the manual map, I presume the latter. And I
can go to either solution for the playground, what is the
preferred way?<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
You should remove the manual map. It's less precise and it even
crosses the Urbis houses.<br>
<br>
On 2013-10-18 09:05, Jo wrote :<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>André suggested to use leisure=playground for the
'speelplaats' of a school. To me leisure=playground stands
for speeltuin/plaine de jeux. The inside of a school where
children play during their breaks is something else,
unless it's open to the public to come and let their
children play there all the time.<br>
<br>
</div>
Normally it should be enough to simply not tag it at all. If
it's the inner part of a multipolygon, it already serves its
purpose to make a 'hole' in the building.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
I agree but I found no better and it seemed obvious that it's
private.<br>
A little more digging and I found that it should be<br>
<br>
<div class="mw-search-result-heading"><a
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground"
title="Tag:landuse=recreation ground">landuse=recreation ground</a><br>
access=private<br>
surface=...<br>
<br>
To be checked, of course.<br>
I could have sent the school a cc: of this but you can't do that
with a stupid SMS like contact form, can you.<br>
<br>
Cordialement,
<br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>