<div dir="ltr">Another question related to this boundary. Originally I did not touch the boundary between Mechelen en Bonheiden. I just reused it for the Muizen-boundary. I now noticed that the Bonheidensteenweg (<a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146650425">http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146650425</a>) was partially in Muizen-Mechelen and Bonheiden. So I moved the boundary at that point, i.e. moved 1 point by merging it with the streetname change point.<div>
<br></div><div>But now I wonder whether the boundary should not be over the stream Boeimeerbeek. That makes more sense to me. In this case the street name change should occur in the middle of the bridge.</div><div><br></div>
<div>I just checked AGIV, there is no (street) name on the bridge, but the street names are different on both sides of the stream. Also, the name of the stream is Vrouwvliet according to AGIV.</div><div><br></div><div>Can we improve the boundaries with data from AGIV ? Is there a WMS layer or shape files we can use ?</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>m</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Marc Gemis <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marc.gemis@gmail.com" target="_blank">marc.gemis@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Glenn,<div><br></div><div>I just used the node that was already in OSM. I'll move it. I've done some surveys there, so I know where you want it.<div>
<br></div><div>regards</div></div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div>
<div>m</div></font></span></div><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:43 AM, Glenn Plas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:glenn@byte-consult.be" target="_blank">glenn@byte-consult.be</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div>Exactly what I feared, that point in
Muizen has probably never been of any importance, in that sense
the real historic centre of Muizen is the area at the new church
(and old tower) , about 1Km to the northwest of the current
coordinate used as centre. Thats the reason I asked, it is so
way off anything important (ever) and the location is
insignificant even now. Muizen (was) a village that is divided by
de Dijle and de Leuvense Steenweg. Mechelen is currently
consuming it at an evergrowing rate.<span><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Glenn</font></span><div><div><br>
<br>
<br>
On 05-12-13 02:13, André Pirard wrote:<br>
</div></div></div>
<blockquote type="cite"><div><div>
<div>On 2013-12-05 01:03, Glenn Plas wrote
:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">Marc, <br>
<br>
What is the point of the administrative center in the relation ?
<a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3359778" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3359778</a>
<br>
<br>
I'm from that area, I know Muizen by heart but that
administrative center .... that position has no meaning to me,
just wondering what that represents. <br>
</blockquote>
I'm not sure about Muizen, but I can compare with Dolembreux.<br>
The question is first: "what is Dolembreux?"<br>
Dolembreux is a "former municipality". It no longer exists as an
administrative boundary but yet it is still mapped as such,
historically. People love that.<br>
And its "admin_center" is the "former administrative center". It
no longer exists as such either, but the mention continues to
indicate where the center town or village is.<br>
It's just like Searching for Brussels on <a href="http://OSM.org" target="_blank">OSM.org</a>,
selecting Village Boundary and you get this boundary <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2404021" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2404021</a>
with the village in the middle :-)<br>
I personally love this one the best -)<br>
<br>
Please note that, if the administration has moved to level 8 (to
have the citizens pay petrol rather than the administration pay
personnel), the Post Office continues to use level 9 very much
(for post, not office) and that they even use a sort of level 10.<br>
<br>
I would vote for a former_admin_center proposition, but there
should be an admin_center vote first!<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
</div></div><div><pre>_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
<a href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a>
</pre>
</div></blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-be mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>