<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2014-04-04 16:14, Nelson A. de
Oliveira wrote :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAARFvTWHDqyy3YMc8BZXbVdbC9M9Pe+=AfgKjf8oGaqsuXDLyw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:54 AM, fly <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:lowflight66@googlemail.com"><lowflight66@googlemail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 03.04.2014 21:22, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:17 PM, fly <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:lowflight66@googlemail.com"><lowflight66@googlemail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Is noexit=yes useful on ways ?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">The way has one side that has/is an exit :-)
Tagging the whole way as "noexit=yes" seems strange.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">If it is accepted, I gonna hange the wiki accordingly and gonna ask a
for validator checks in JOSM, as we have more than 100,000 ways with
this tag.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Basically I agree with the current text of
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit</a> (except that I don't
agree to use it on ways).</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, except that it's a little bit unclear and hence much
misunderstood.<br>
I made a revisable update according to what has been said before.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAARFvTWHDqyy3YMc8BZXbVdbC9M9Pe+=AfgKjf8oGaqsuXDLyw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I also can't see why, but people also use noexit=no
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/noexit#values">http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/noexit#values</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
In fact, the most misleading point is "noexit" itself.<br>
According to the true meaning, it should be "intentional_tag" or
something that could apply to other seemingly funny tags too.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>