<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2014-06-17 21:58, Jo wrote :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAJ6DwMAc3yXLJmOEGzu2dBrumokGEBXEnhZ-kxJFBe25-hku0w@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>The way I always understood the word survey in an OSM
context is physically going somewhere, recording a fact
about the geography and adding it to Openstreetmap. The job
of a surveyor. I guess it's OK to send somebody else who
takes picture or adds POIs for you.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
One of the BIG OSM problem is that the wiki does not define survey
and other words at all and that the dictionaries contain up to 12
definitions for them.<br>
My big problem is that I can't think like those who tell me that I
have to learn that OSM is fuzzy, or think that if a GPS tells me to
turn right I might have to turn left, and that people laugh at me
when I believe that it could be done correctly.<br>
In this case, I will give up doing more than considering that the
data source is TEC, please Jo make sure that your file contains
source=<b>TEC 2014-04</b> so that we didn't have to type it every
time and that we do all the same.<br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
PS: sorry for a duplicate post to a few.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>