<div dir="ltr">André,<div><br></div><div>my apologies for using the word "rambling", due my limited knowledge of English, I couldn't come up with a better word.<div><br></div><div>I first wanted to write a long answer, but eventually I decided to spend my time in a more interesting way, by mapping lanes & turn:lanes</div>
</div><div><br></div><div>bye,</div><div><br></div><div>m</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:13 AM, André Pirard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:A.Pirard.Papou@gmail.com" target="_blank">A.Pirard.Papou@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div>On 2014-07-04 16:02, Marc Gemis wrote :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="">
<div>On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:46 PM, André Pirard <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:A.Pirard.Papou@gmail.com" target="_blank">A.Pirard.Papou@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On 2014-07-04 15:00, Marc Gemis wrote :<br>
</div>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">about which multicolored icons
are you rambling ?<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
Can't you really open the hiking map, look at the osmc icons
and compare with "le balisage normalisé"?<span><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</font></span></blockquote>
<br></div><div class="">
which hiking map ? <a href="http://www.wanderreitkarte.de/" target="_blank">http://www.wanderreitkarte.de/</a>
? <a href="http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/" target="_blank">http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/</a>
? another one ?<br>
<div>e.g. waymarkedtrails aka lonvia is using it's own color
scheme. It ignores all colors / icons set on the relation. Do
you really think all the walking networks in Flanders are
marked with orange signs ?</div>
</div><div><br>
<div> As far as I know there is no . So when you rely on Dutch
or German people the chances are small that they stick to
the conventions of "le balisage normalisé" (<a href="http://www.sentiers.be/comprendre-les-chemins-et-sentiers/la-signaletique-et-le-balisage/le-balisage-normalise/" target="_blank">http://www.sentiers.be/comprendre-les-chemins-et-sentiers/la-signaletique-et-le-balisage/le-balisage-normalise/</a>
)</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Rambling ??? Who is?<br>
Please notice that the subject of this thread is Wallonia and that
it quite logically deals with Wallonia.<br>
(and that orange signs are officially obsolete and deprecated since
1830 ;-))<br>
<a href="http://www.waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=13&lat=50.53749&lon=5.56839" target="_blank"><br>
Display the best waymarkedtrails like this</a> and see OSMC
symbols on the map and under <b>Routes</b> like this:<br>
<br>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part6.07070207.00060606@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>ES01.
Esneux - Promenade des artistes (Ham)</a> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part6.07070207.00060606@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>ES01v
- Ham variante</a> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part10.07020704.05080308@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>ES02.
Esneux - Le Tige de Fontin</a> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part12.07000501.06090200@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>ES03.
Esneux - Autour d'Avionpuits</a> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part14.07090209.04010303@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>ES04.
Esneux - Chemin des Carrières</a> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part16.06000205.09010503@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>ES05.
Esneux - Boucle de l'Ourthe (Ham)</a> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part18.00020405.04030406@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>ES06.
Esneux - Circuit de la Roche-aux-Faucons</a> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part20.09050503.02080007@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>ES07
- Esneux - Parc du Mary, Heid des Corbeaux et Tessenire</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part22.00050304.00040406@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>ES08
- Esneux - Rond Bâti</a> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part24.05060309.08050802@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>SPR05
Sprimont 5: Tultay</a> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part26.04010809.07030407@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>SPR06
Sprimont 6: Gomzé</a> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part28.07090001.03030907@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>SPR07
Sprimont 7: Dolembreux</a> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>...<br>
</td>
<td><a>...</a>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
Typical tags:<br>
<table dir="ltr">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">website</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td><a href="http://www.ourthe-ambleve.be/insitu/fiche.php?lang=fr&cle=8053" target="_blank">http://www.ourthe-ambleve.be/insitu/fiche.php?lang=fr&cle=8053</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">name</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>ES06. Esneux - Circuit de la Roche-aux-Faucons</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">roundtrip</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">type</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>route</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">route</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>hiking</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">network</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>lwn</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">oneway</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">operator</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>SI Esneux</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">ref</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>ES06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">osmc:symbol</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>yellow:yellow:yellow_rectangle:6:black</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
Other locations outside Wallonia show <b>Routes</b> like this:<br>
<br>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><br>
</td>
<td><a>(1563591)</a>
<br>
<small>91-92</small> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part32.08040701.02090101@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>(1563607)</a>
<br>
<small>99-123</small> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part32.08040701.02090101@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>(1563608)</a>
<br>
<small>97-99</small> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part32.08040701.02090101@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>(1570051)</a>
<br>
<small>99-197</small> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img src="cid:part32.08040701.02090101@gmail.com"></td>
<td><a>...</a><small></small>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
Typical tag:<br>
<table dir="ltr">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">note</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>90-165</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">network:name</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>Rivierenland</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">route</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>foot</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">type</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>route</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">network</td>
<td valign="top">:</td>
<td>rwn</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<span style="background-color:#dde;white-space:pre-wrap"><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:osmc:symbol" title="Key:osmc:symbol" target="_blank">osmc:symbol</a>=* is not peculiar to </span>any
map renderer. The symbol icons are visible only on those that
implement it indeed. Contrary to what you say, <a href="http://www.waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=13&lat=50.55297&lon=5.92837" target="_blank">hiking.waymarkedtrails.org</a>
is one that does and it suffices to open their site and look at the
German, ... and the few Walloon hikes to see it.<br>
<br>
What does that "Belgian making a hiking map" mean? Who are those
sticking Dutch and Germans?<br>
Let us speak a precise language please. Walloon hikes are chosen a
symbol by their organizers (operator ...). The mapper uses the
corresponding osmc symbol tag. The renderer renders that tag. I
just can't see what the Belgian, Dutch or German rambling has to do
with that.<br>
<br>
An issue is that since 2007-2012 only 4 plain color symbols are
legal in Wallonia but that<br>
<ul>
<li>OSM symbols, and even hike websites, continue to use other
symbols</li>
<li>the sites do not use the official ref but some ID of their own</li>
<li>and the probability to "officially" jump from RED 3 of
municipality A to RED 3 of municipality B now becomes
significant </li>
</ul><div class="">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>So please bark at the right tree. If you don't agree with a
rendering, complain to the people that made the map. File a
bug report, send an email, whatever. We, ordinary mappers,
cannot influence the color if they ignore the tags.</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
Again, what is that barking about rendering problem, what is "people
who made the map", what bug report?<br>
We, ordinary mappers, do define the symbol colors if we tag osmc.<br>
We, ordinary mappers, should try to use the legal symbol if signing
is as important as you say.<br>
We, ordinary mappers, should try to use the official ref but when I
do StijnRR removes it whimsically.<br>
We, ordinary mappers, should try to convince renderers to display
both official ref and unofficial ID. For that point you're right
about sending an email and filing a bug report, but I really wonder
why you say it because it's one thing that I've done already.<br>
Your rambling doesn't make any sense.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
</font></span></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-be mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>