<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:HelveticaNeue-Light, Helvetica Neue Light, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:16px"><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_2923"><span style="" class="" id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_2931">"</span>It's useless to draw two "ways" for a single double-track railroad line": almost everywhere all tracks are mapped seperately</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_2992" dir="ltr">"to not use a detailed schema for complex station grids": all detail is mapped in most stations</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_3090" dir="ltr">"When on a four track group of lines - and this is the case on L36/L36N
between Leuven and Brussels - the two inner tracks are another line than
the two outer ones, I propose to nevertheless draw them next to each
other, nicely parallel as prescribed in the "How to draw a motorway"
page.": can it become more outdated?<br></div>And what about the voltage, frequency, gauge, usage, ref, name, ... tags? Which tags should be used in Belgium, which not, en which values should they have?<br><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_3251" dir="ltr">And what about the relations and the tags they should have?</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_3252" dir="ltr"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_3464" dir="ltr">Also this page could use some rewriting...</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_3447" dir="ltr"><a id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_3446" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Railways">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Railways</a></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_3465" dir="ltr"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_3253" dir="ltr">Regards,</div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_3254" dir="ltr"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_3289" dir="ltr">Stijn<br></div><br> <div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_2963" style="font-family: HelveticaNeue-Light, Helvetica Neue Light, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_2962" style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"> <div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_2961" dir="ltr"> <hr id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_3050" size="1"> <font id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_2960" size="2" face="Arial"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Glenn Plas <glenn@byte-consult.be><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Stijn Rombauts <stijnrombauts@yahoo.com>; OpenStreetMap Belgium <talk-be@openstreetmap.org> <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Monday, January 12, 2015 8:05 PM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [OSM-talk-be] Railway data accuracy , age and origin<br> </font> </div> <div id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_2964" class="y_msg_container"><br>What is wrong with it? most what I see looks still up to date. Could<br clear="none">you be more specific ?<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Glenn<br clear="none"><div class="qtdSeparateBR"><br><br></div><div class="yqt2338386516" id="yqtfd19006"><br clear="none">On 12-01-15 19:51, Stijn Rombauts wrote:<br clear="none">> Wouldn't it be a good idea then to give this page a decent update so<br clear="none">> everybody knows how railways should be tagged:<br clear="none">> <a id="yui_3_16_0_1_1421090326417_3051" shape="rect" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Railways" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Railways</a><br clear="none">> Otherwise it is very well possible that someone else will 'destroy' a<br clear="none">> lot of your work.<br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> Regards,<br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> StijnRR<br clear="none">> <br clear="none"></div><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></body></html>