<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2015-11-26 10:07, Sander Deryckere
wrote :<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CABUOUO_8rmAFcDe61wW8R=LRCqhMpFwaDbKv=pLi+V9Wyi-fXQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>Do we really need these old URBIS urls? What use are
they for regular mappers (in contrast to people interested
in recent history of a region)? IMO they would clutter the
list.<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Old versions of aerial photos are often very interesting when
something is difficult to see on recent ones.<br>
An example that their users know very well is trees that are hiding
the ground or not.<br>
Also, I was very impressed to discover the works over 6 years in
Brussels.<br>
And they may be useful, for example to check that what's on the map
is an old topology.<br>
But if the general opinion is to lessen chance to see better and not
find older years exist, I will remove them.<br>
Don't forget (obviously) to tell which years you want removed.<br>
And install what you like before removal, those who like.<br>
<br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>André.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>