<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Le 31/05/2017 à 00:39, André Pirard a écrit :<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:592DF49E.1080505@gmail.com">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
What is the need to contact all those people after a SPW lawyer
made the situation clear?<br>
</blockquote>
To get an explicit authorization, like I said.
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:592DF49E.1080505@gmail.com">
<blockquote
cite="mid:aabfcf4e-27c4-159b-c0e8-e3fb812aa078@gmail.com"
type="cite">Following that, I've been on the phone with him and
he told me that, like many already know, we can use the data
from the SPW for OSM.<br>
</blockquote>
Not at all.<br>
For anyone having understood the terms of the SPW that are
clarified in my "YES we can trace the PICC" message, we are not
allowed to use (copy) the (vector) data of the PICC but we are
allowed to trace the images of the WMS et al. services.<br>
</blockquote>
By "using" I meant tracing while using the data as as background.<br>
I also talked about the buildings numbers from PICC, which make it
much easier to add building address details in OSM.<br>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:592DF49E.1080505@gmail.com">
<blockquote
cite="mid:aabfcf4e-27c4-159b-c0e8-e3fb812aa078@gmail.com"
type="cite"> I had been requesting authorization for PICC and
orthophotos, but he told me that there are other potentially
useful data like <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://geoportail.wallonie.be/catalogue/f3cdf392-a569-423e-889e-186c5e647cd3.html">MNT</a>
(relief) and others.<br>
<br>
However, since I'd been asking for an explicit authorization
(needed for integration into the iD editor), he told me that the
authorization contract templates they've got require an
organization. Probably because the data is free of the
associations without lucrative purpose.<br>
</blockquote>
First, I strongly discourage using ID and Potlatch. This is what
has led to highly imprecise Wallonia tagging as well as
introducing tagging errors over the years. All that work has to
be redone with correction.<br>
Please use the PICC with JOSM to achieve a 25 cm precision
excellent tagging.<br>
</blockquote>
I don't understand, why does JOSM allow a higher precision? Because
we can manually correct the background offset?<br>
But if it's that, I wonder how you correct the background offset
down to 25 cm. Do you have a professional GPS receiver? Standard GPS
devices are only down to 3 meters.<br>
Anyway, users will still use iD, so providing them with a better
imagery is a good thing in my opinion.<br>
<br>
Thomas<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>