<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Nice! Good to hear that!<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11.12.19 10:32, Lionel Giard wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+D7pWwkkwWuzwO0+zsqsRFc=niDq6cdKfXL+aP3cT1sj0O1xQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">To answer Joost question about relevance in other
regions : yes it is relevant. Wallonia recently started to plan
and implement these "cycle highway" to reach Brussels from
multiple different locations (with protected cycleway along
motorway, national road or railway). They want to connect and
continue some of the existing cycle highway in Flanders (like
the F20 near Halle and go further to Tubize...).
<div>That would definitely be a belgian thing, and not only
flanders. ^_^</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le mer. 11 déc. 2019 à 10:12,
Marc Gemis <<a href="mailto:marc.gemis@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">marc.gemis@gmail.com</a>> a
écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">>
Tagging scheme<br>
><br>
> I'd actually go for `cycle_network=BE:cycle_highway`, as
cycle_network normally has a country prefix. Because most
(all?) of them are already tagged, we could simply update the
tagging all at once. I'll do that next week, unless a better
proposal or good reason not to is raised.<br>
<br>
to be honest I find "network" strange in the context of a
single<br>
cycle_highway. All cycle_highways together form a network, but
a<br>
single one not.<br>
We do not map the E 19 motorway as car_network:BE:motorway,
but we do<br>
have a relation for all parts of the E 19 in a route-relation
(I<br>
think, OSM website was soo slow yesterday when I tried to
access the<br>
page on E-motorways).<br>
<br>
Is this cycle_network value OK with the inventors of that tag
? Wasn't<br>
it invented recently to distinguish cycle networks from local
cycle<br>
routes ?<br>
<br>
In conclusion: I would prefer another way to tag cycle
highways<br>
<br>
regards<br>
<br>
m<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-be mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Pieter Vander Vennet</pre>
</body>
</html>