<div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jan 6, 2020, 23:07 Pieter Vander Vennet <<a href="mailto:pietervdvn@posteo.net">pietervdvn@posteo.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Hey everyone,</p>
<p>After some silence in this thread, I would like to close it with
a small wrap-up.</p>
<p>As the consensus is clear, I've created <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycle_network%3Dcycle_highway" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">a
wiki page describing the tag in detail</a>. Feel free to update,
add or correct on this page. Additionally, I've added links and
updated tagging on a few wiki pages where I encountered the old
tagging.</p>
<p><br>
Secondly, I would wish to thank Polyglot for his extensive work on
the mapping of these cycle networks and to already execute the
changes described here!<br></p></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I may have made a mistake though. I only saw it when I reread the thread; BE: is missing.</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><p>
</p>
<p>Thirdly, I would like to thank everyone involved for all the
ideas and the constructive way everything was discussed!<br>
</p>
<p>Kind regards & best wishes for 2020,<br>
Pietervdvn<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div>On 26.12.19 11:16, EeBie wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
I am checking some cycling highways with status proposed and keep
the parts that are released as usable (Befietsbaar) in the
relation and delete the status proposed to make them visible and
usable in routeplanners. <br>
I experienced that the information on the website
Fietssnelwegen.be is not 100% correct. There are parts released
where no bike access is allowed. I leave these parts out and also
the parts over unpaved paths that are difficult for usual bikes. <br>
<br>
Eebie <br>
<br>
<div>Op 25/12/19 om 13:14 schreef joost
schouppe:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto">Hi Jo,
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I think that's the right thing to do, thank
you. </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">What I'm still a bit unclear about: if the
route itself is unfinished, but large sections of them
are, then I would think the finished parts do deserve a
"ready for use state". We talked about this briefly
before, maybe someone here has an idea how to split up the
route (say F3) in three types of subrelations :</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">- usable, ready and waymarked (so similar to
any "normal" cycle route)</div>
<div dir="auto">- usable but not ready or waymarked (here
the route is proposed, I'd say)</div>
<div dir="auto">- unusable (here the ways themselves are
proposed)</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">As stated by Stijn and Eebie, the
connections "invented" by Jo don't belong in OSM. However
some of these detours are in fact waymarked. For example,
in the cycle highway Brussel-Halle there is an official
detour that will be in place for two years. I'm not sure
if this kind of situation needs to ge in a fourth type...</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Joost</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Op di 24 dec. 2019 10:57
schreef Jo <<a href="mailto:winfixit@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">winfixit@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">All the figments of my imagination have
been removed. I reviewed the remaining ones, and fixed
them here and there. Where it's not possible to use them
today to get from the start till the end, they are
marked as state=proposed.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Jo</div>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-be mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org" rel="noreferrer
noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be" rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
<a href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Talk-be mailing list
<a href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre cols="72">--
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Pieter Vander Vennet</pre>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-be mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-be@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div>