<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div><div class=""><font color="#000000" class=""><span style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0);" class="">Thanks for sharing your ideas Vincent.</span></font><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div><div><br class=""></div>I mostly agree with you except on that point : <br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><p style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;" class="">- A footway is definitely useful: this is a path too small for horses and mountain bikes. (By mountain bikers, I mean "standard people", aka end users, not pro mountain bikers who can pass nearly everywhere a pedestrian passes!) That definitely correspond to what bikers call "singles": a very small track, where two bikes cannot pass side by side.</p><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"></div></blockquote></div>Even if the wiki is not definitive about the use of that tag (mostly because of national specifics), most if not all the pictures refers to ways in <u class="">urbanized places</u> where the attention has been put on pedestrian mobility. Most are guarded by “pedestrian only” road signs.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">What you’re trying to show on the map can be reached with tags like trail_visibility, surface, smoothness, mtb_scale, bicycle, and even width. I believe that mapping a footway for a super small path is leading to exactly the contrary of what you’re trying to avoid : people will try to follow those paths because they’re emphasised by most renderers.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""> I also realized the lack of consensus, but also the good reason for the lack of consensus: the problem is not that simple, and there are different points of view, sometime very opposite, but also with a good common base.</blockquote></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">There *is* actually a consensus if I refer to the reactions to my questioning this morni</div></body></html>