<div dir="ltr"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" class="gmail_default">Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:50:47 +0200<br>
From: joost schouppe <<a href="mailto:joost.schouppe@gmail.com" target="_blank">joost.schouppe@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: OpenStreetMap Belgium <<a href="mailto:talk-be@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk-be@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk-be] Missing windmills data ?</div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" class="gmail_default"></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" class="gmail_default"></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Hi,<span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">[...]</span><span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"> </span>That said, it's probably useful to have tags or<span class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"> </span>polygons to group the data.<br></blockquote><div> </div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" class="gmail_default">Please avoid polygons as the geometry shall not be a physical feature in the landscape. IMHO tags or relations seem to be better.</div><div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" class="gmail_default"><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif" class="gmail_default">Pierre P.</div></div><br></div></div></div>