[Talk-ca] [Imports] [Talk-us] TIGER considered harmful
kate at maploser.com
Sun Nov 15 23:28:01 GMT 2009
Understood, I would envision it being a partially manual and partially
Maybe I'm confused about the address versus road information. I would think
the address point would be the front door of the building and would not be a
relation to the road. So the node of the address and the way of the road
would not be on top of each other.
Is this incorrect?
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Dave Hansen <dave at sr71.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 18:11 -0500, Kate Chapman wrote:
> > What's wrong with doing automated addressing imports in situations
> > where we have point level address data?
> The issue is that it may not line up with the roads at all. We also
> need to ensure that we *find* the roads to which it refers to ensure
> that we get the relations done properly.
> If people find a way to do that, it shouldn't be a problem.
> > Or are you just referring to not importing the addressing that is
> > available for the Tiger data?
> -- Dave
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Talk-ca