<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.30.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BR>
So just a blanket restriction on each one? I see the Public Service Vehicle class includes buses and the like which wouldn't use the crossovers anyway so that won't do it. Didn't see a way to tag for public emergency vehicle access only.<BR>
<BR>
Sam <BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
<B>From</B>: Russell Porter <<A HREF="mailto:Russell%20Porter%20%3ccontact@russellporter.com%3e">contact@russellporter.com</A>><BR>
<B>To</B>: Samuel Longiaru <<A HREF="mailto:Samuel%20Longiaru%20%3clongiaru@shaw.ca%3e">longiaru@shaw.ca</A>><BR>
<B>Subject</B>: Re: [Talk-ca] Routing errors, turn restrictions and median crossovers<BR>
<B>Date</B>: Sat, 05 Mar 2011 20:35:52 -0800<BR>
<BR>
<PRE>
Access=no?
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Samuel Longiaru <<A HREF="mailto:longiaru@shaw.ca">longiaru@shaw.ca</A>> wrote:
> I'm getting a number of crazy routings that suggest doing U-turns via
> emergency median crossovers. The crossovers are in the imports and they all
> throw errors in regards to service roads connected to motorways. I guess
> they could all get turn restrictions applicable to all but public service
> vehicles but does existing routing software make the distinction as to
> vehicle type anyway? Any suggestion as to how to treat these? We really
> don't want these kinds of routes.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sam L.
> Kamloops
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> <A HREF="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</A>
> <A HREF="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</A>
>
>
</PRE>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>