Richard,<div><br></div><div>I couldn't agree more. It is interesting to see also how it can replace the current network (and by replace, I mean "oh no!!").</div><div><br></div><div>In most cities, the railway network has been improved with imagery and commuter network stations, platforms, routes, etc. We have to be very careful not to impact the improvements already done on OSM.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Olivier<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:00 AM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:talk-ca-request@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk-ca-request@openstreetmap.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 15:07:44 -0400<br>
From: Richard Weait <<a href="mailto:richard@weait.com">richard@weait.com</a>><br>
To: Matthew Buchanan <<a href="mailto:matthew.ian.buchanan@gmail.com">matthew.ian.buchanan@gmail.com</a>><br>
Cc: OSM Talk-ca <<a href="mailto:talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] National Railway Network - R?seau ferroviaire<br>
national<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<CAGwUD5uAY_vBDA=5V_Zdq=<a href="mailto:oYLuVmZW0qj%2BgAdbtuxxQDb2BGAw@mail.gmail.com">oYLuVmZW0qj+gAdbtuxxQDb2BGAw@mail.gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1<br>
<br>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Matthew Buchanan<br>
<<a href="mailto:matthew.ian.buchanan@gmail.com">matthew.ian.buchanan@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> GeoBase now has railway data for most provinces. BC, Alberta, and<br>
> Quebec will be released this fall.<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/en/data/nrwn/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/en/data/nrwn/index.html</a><br>
> <a href="http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/fr/data/nrwn/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/fr/data/nrwn/index.html</a><br>
><br>
> I uploaded a small portion near Regina as a test. (the spurs only)<br>
> <a href="http://osm.org/go/WjfQlb2zh-?m=" target="_blank">http://osm.org/go/WjfQlb2zh-?m=</a><br>
><br>
> There are a lot of extra attributes, only some of which will be<br>
> useful. I plan to write a python script to translate some of the codes<br>
> into an OSM standard, unless someone has a better idea of how to do<br>
> it.<br>
<br>
Hi Matthew,<br>
<br>
It's great to have new datasets available for our inspection. I'm not<br>
clear from your email if you uploaded the small portion in the manner<br>
of an import, or if you used all of the resources available including<br>
the new data set to essentially map the data. Just in case, I'll put<br>
this link here,<br>
<br>
<a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import</a><br>
<br>
and remind everybody that no dataset, no matter how well curated or<br>
well intended, can be imported into OpenStreetMap without very careful<br>
planning and consultation in advance.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-ca mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</a><br>
<br>
<br>
End of Talk-ca Digest, Vol 66, Issue 10<br>
***************************************<br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><a href="http://www.olivierhill.ca/">http://www.olivierhill.ca/</a>
</div>