<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">I mean how do we decide a tile is mapped? Normally in HOT its when the list of things in the instructions are completed.<br><br>"<br><p>Also trace
- Routes in the region</p>
<ul><li>
<p>Polygons around the residential areas in areas around Fort McMurray</p>
</li><li>
<p>Isolated buildings outside urban places</p>
</li><li>
<p>Names of missing roads</p>
</li><li>
<p>Addresses (via geobase)</p>
</li></ul>
<p>Check Addresses are valid with <a href="http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-111.33512&lat=56.71888&zoom=12&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way">GeoFabrik inspector tool"</a></p><p>That's quite a lot for a tile, mapping buildings is one process, adding addresses is another, checking the addresses is yet another.</p><p>Based on HOT experience its best to keep it fairly simple. So I suggest:</p><p>First project tile and map buildings. This is a fairly simple task that a beginner with the JOSM building tool can do fairly well.<br></p><p>Second project tile and add addresses. This is more complex.<br></p><p>Third project tile GeoFabrick inspector tool. This is even more complex.<br></p><p>You can have more than one set of tiles gridding the area.<br></p><p>Cheerio John<br></p></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 9 May 2016 at 17:36, James <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:james2432@gmail.com" target="_blank">james2432@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">Bing imagery is better than mapbox in that region. For addressing do you mean building by building or CanVec interpolation?</p><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">
<div class="gmail_quote">On May 9, 2016 5:11 PM, "john whelan" <<a href="mailto:jwhelan0112@gmail.com" target="_blank">jwhelan0112@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">Should we layer this ie one project to map the buildings, another to add addresses, the processes are quite different and at the moment its difficult to say a tile is done for buildings when the address info hasn't been added and that means mappers going over the same tiles multiple times.<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">Are we using Mapbox imagery or Bing for this one by the way?<br><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">Thanks John<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 9 May 2016 at 16:11, Kunce, Dale <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dale.kunce@redcross.org" target="_blank">dale.kunce@redcross.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">If we can get good pre-event imagery and do the building by building assessment I don’t think we will need post-event imagery but I can be on the lookout for it.<br>
<span><br>
Dale<br>
—<br>
Dale Kunce | Senior Geospatial Engineer and GIS Team Lead | International Services | American Red Cross<br>
2025 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20006<br>
<br>
Tel <a href="tel:202.303.4095" value="+12023034095" target="_blank">202.303.4095</a> | Cell <a href="tel:510.842.7523" value="+15108427523" target="_blank">510.842.7523</a> | Skype dkunce<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span><div><div>On 5/9/16, 4:08 PM, "Paul Norman" <<a href="mailto:penorman@mac.com" target="_blank">penorman@mac.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
>On 5/9/2016 12:43 PM, Kunce, Dale wrote:<br>
>> Bernie,<br>
>> I do see that the building footprints are in the esri basemap<br>
>> unfortunately this doesn’t actually help. The esri basemap data is<br>
>> just an tiled image and does not provide us with the vector data that<br>
>> we need to complete our work. I’m happy to take the lead and<br>
>> coordinate the mapping. The existing Bing imagery is good enough for<br>
>> our needs for tracing.<br>
>><br>
><br>
>Any hope of getting post-event imagery, which will allow us to avoid<br>
>mapping buildings which no longer exist and shouldn't be in OSM?<br>
><br>
>_______________________________________________<br>
>Talk-ca mailing list<br>
><a href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
><a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-ca mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-ca mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>