<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 1/21/2017 3:11 PM, Paul Norman wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:9abfb0f0-6c44-e9d2-d0a2-6f510e1150c0@mac.com"
type="cite">On 1/20/2017 5:33 PM, john whelan wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">Did you include
permission for the bus stops as well? They are from the same
source and the same licence. I think I might have included one
pitch sport soccer. The pitch was mapped but the sport soccer
was I must confess taken from their open data source.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I kept it generic, not specifying a particular dataset. That way
we'll have a final answer one way or the other and won't have to
go back to them all the time.
</blockquote>
<br>
The initial answer was that the license would impose obligations on
top of the ODbL, our distribution license. This would make the data
incompatible.<br>
<br>
I have gotten back to them with some additional questions which
might offer a way forwards and clarify the problems. If I can't get
anywhere we'll have to decide what to do, but it will probably mean
we can write off the City of Ottawa as a potential data source.<br>
</body>
</html>