<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">>How do we want to move this discussion forward? Do we need to set up a
time to talk on the phone? I am willing to help coordinate logistics.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">I think we need a contact at Stats and since Bjenk has left I'm not sure who is doing what. Alessandro is more management overview than a working contact although I've cced him so he can identify a point person.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">The first step is make sure the municipal license is in alignment with the TB 2.0 open data license. <br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">So question to Kent/Open-Ouvert how is the municipal Open Data package coming along? <br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif;font-size:small">Thanks John<br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 27 September 2017 at 18:20, Matthew Darwin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matthew@mdarwin.ca" target="_blank">matthew@mdarwin.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">How do we want to move this discussion forward? Do we need to set up a time to talk on the phone? I am willing to help coordinate logistics.<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 2017-09-17 10:55 AM, Stewart C. Russell wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On 2017-09-17 10:40 AM, john whelan wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
They'd like to extend it across Canada so now might be the time to think<br>
about the project.<br>
</blockquote>
That sounds good. Despite some prodding, the Licence Working Group (LWG)<br>
hasn't got back to me with any updates on how they want to handle the<br>
Toronto or Ontario licences. I first contacted them in March, so if it<br>
takes them six months or more to look at the licence, then this import<br>
is a multi year (if not multi-decade) project. Remember, LWG has decided<br>
that *every* Canadian licence variant needs their sign-off.<br>
<br>
Denis Carr (open data lead) from Toronto has been on board since the<br>
spring, and I hope hasn't forgotten us.<br>
<br>
Toronto has nice building outlines (embedded in the 3D Massing data set,<br>
so we can pull out base elevation and height). We also have address<br>
points already in the middle of buildings.<br>
<br>
It also is of great help that the Esri Community Imagery includes some<br>
very nice municipal air photos for verification.<br>
<br>
Stewart<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Talk-ca mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.or<wbr>g/listinfo/talk-ca</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Talk-ca mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.or<wbr>g/listinfo/talk-ca</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>