<div dir="auto"><div><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Feb 12, 2018 17:51, "Matthew Darwin" <<a href="mailto:matthew@mdarwin.ca">matthew@mdarwin.ca</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">Hi,</font></p>
<p><font face="Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif">I am now reviewing the
<b>addr</b><b>:city</b> tag. Seems we are not very consistent
how we use it. For example, Toronto:</font></p>
<pre><tt> 110707 City of Toronto
9603 Toronto</tt></pre></div></blockquote></div></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">With my minimalist mapping hat on (it's invisible), if a municipality has a boundary defined, we absolutely don't need addr:city (or province or country) in address points. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">We've had a particularly active mapper in Toronto who added addr:city as a kind of calling card. They also added all of the former municipalities, still used by the mail for some reason. </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"> Stewart</div></div>