<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
      charset=windows-1252">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-text-html" lang="x-western"> On 2018-03-26 07:20 AM,
      Olivia Robu - (p) wrote:<br>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL2PR17MB08045CF0164FA9A4453A7F1FE4AD0@BL2PR17MB0804.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <p class="MsoNormal">Hello,</p>
          <p class="MsoNormal">The Telenav Map team has done some
            research on the status of the ways and relations of
            Trans-Canada Highway. </p>
          <p class="MsoNormal">Here are some conclusions from this
            research: </p>
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l3 level1 lfo1">The
              highway is formed from 30 routes;</li>
          </ul>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      The Trans-Canada highway is not really 1 highway, so this is
      probably not surprising.   In many places, the Trans-Canada
      highway splits in 2, so probably cannot have 1 route anyway.<br>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL2PR17MB08045CF0164FA9A4453A7F1FE4AD0@BL2PR17MB0804.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l3 level1 lfo1">Every
              route has different names for the name tag, such as:
              street names, other routes names or Trans-Canada highway
              name in different forms;</li>
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l3 level1 lfo1">The
              issue above is repeating for the ref tag;</li>
          </ul>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      IMO the routes and the refs need to match, or the refs need to be
      removed given that routes should supersede refs.  In my
      investigations in Ontario I see lots of places where routes and
      refs don't match.<br>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL2PR17MB08045CF0164FA9A4453A7F1FE4AD0@BL2PR17MB0804.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l3 level1 lfo1">The
              name of Trans-Canada highway has more than one form
              (Trans-Canada Highway, TransCanada Highway, Trans Canada
              Highway, etc);</li>
          </ul>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      Probably good to standardize that.  However, in Quebec I would
      think the French name would take precedence. "<i>Route
        Transcanadienne"</i><br>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL2PR17MB08045CF0164FA9A4453A7F1FE4AD0@BL2PR17MB0804.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l3 level1 lfo1">Another
              issue is the variety of names in other tags related to it
              (such as: name:en, name:fr, alt_name, alt_name:en,
              alt_name:fr, nat_name);</li>
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l3 level1 lfo1">There
              are some routes that don’t have a route name only ref (5
              routes);</li>
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l3 level1 lfo1">There
              are some routes that overlap:
              <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="circle">
                <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l3 level2 lfo1">in
                  Manitoba: - PTH 1 (MB Trans-Canada Highway) and
                  Trans-Canada Highway (Super);</li>
              </ul>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <p class="MsoNormal">                                                    
            - Yellowhead Highway and PTH 16 (MB Trans-Canada Highway);</p>
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="circle">
              <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l3 level2 lfo1">in
                Alberta: Trans-Canada Highway (AB) and Trans-Canada
                Highway (Super);</li>
              <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l3 level2 lfo1">in
                British Columbia: - Trans-Canada Highway (BC, Super) and
                Trans-Canada Highway;</li>
            </ul>
          </ul>
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2">About
              90% of these routes are broken;</li>
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l0 level1 lfo2">About
              80% of these routes have highway value flip flop
              (motorway, trunk, primary);</li>
          </ul>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      Highway 17 in Ontario is not a motorway.  So I would expect
      different segments to be different.  Highway 417 (motorway)
      changes to Highway 17 (trunk) just west of Arnprior Ontario.  This
      is correct. <br>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL2PR17MB08045CF0164FA9A4453A7F1FE4AD0@BL2PR17MB0804.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:18.0pt">We propose to
            make some improvements to standardize all the routes. We
            would like to get your thoughts and feedback on the
            following questions:</p>
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo3">What
              is the correct form for the name that appears in the way
              name tag? For example: “Highway 417” is part of
              Trans-Canada Highway and has the name value tag “Highway
              417”. To resolve this issue, we would need to standardize
              the ways’ name tag for all the provinces. The question is,
              should we modify the way names in to “Trans-Canada
              Highway”, or should we insert the name “Trans-Canada
              Highway” at the end of the name, like this: “Highway 417
              (Trans-Canada Highway)”, or should we leave it like it is?
            </li>
          </ul>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      No, definitely not.<br>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL2PR17MB08045CF0164FA9A4453A7F1FE4AD0@BL2PR17MB0804.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo3"><br>
            </li>
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo3">Another
              issue is related to the official name of the highway.
              According to our research the official name for
              Trans-Canada Highway is “Trans-Canada Highway”. In our
              research we have found several forms of this name:
              TransCanada Highway, Trans Canada Highway, etc. Should we
              change all the names to “Trans-Canada Highway”?</li>
          </ul>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      In Quebec probably "<i>Route Transcanadienne"</i>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL2PR17MB08045CF0164FA9A4453A7F1FE4AD0@BL2PR17MB0804.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l1 level1 lfo3"><br>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l2 level1 lfo4">Another
              question is related to the priority of the names in the
              name value tag and also for the ref tag. If we have a way
              that has a street name (“Old Highway 16” or “North York
              River Road”) and two routes that overlap (ex: Trans-Canada
              Highway and Highway 11). What is the name and the ref that
              should appear in the way name tag and ref tag? </li>
          </ul>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      Highway 11.  Local road first.<br>
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL2PR17MB08045CF0164FA9A4453A7F1FE4AD0@BL2PR17MB0804.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l2 level1 lfo4"><br>
            </li>
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l2 level1 lfo4">In
              case of overlapping identical routes (ex: in Manitoba
              there is two routes for Trans-Canada Highway). What should
              be the best approach?</li>
          </ul>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      The Trans-Canada Highway has multiple routes.  It is not one
      highway.  The graphic on wikipedia, probably shows this clearly. <a
        class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
        href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Canada_Highway">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trans-Canada_Highway</a><br>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL2PR17MB08045CF0164FA9A4453A7F1FE4AD0@BL2PR17MB0804.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l2 level1 lfo4"><br>
            </li>
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l2 level1 lfo4">In
              case of highway value flip flop (motorway, trunk,
              primary), there are several segments like this outside the
              cities (ex.: Route “Ontario Highway 17 (Blind River to
              North Bay) (ID 3739829)”, or Route “Trans Canada Highway
              104” (ID 1732797)). For areas outside the cities we
              propose to change the highway value into motorway/trunk.
              What do you think about this issue?</li>
          </ul>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      If it is really a motorway, yes.  But many places outside of
      cities it is not a motorway.<br>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL2PR17MB08045CF0164FA9A4453A7F1FE4AD0@BL2PR17MB0804.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <ul style="margin-top:0cm" type="disc">
            <li class="MsoNormal" style="mso-list:l2 level1 lfo4"><br>
            </li>
          </ul>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          <p class="MsoNormal">We think that one approach to resolve the
            first problem could be to add “Trans-Canada Highway” or
            “Highway 417 (Trans-Canada Highway)” to the way name for all
            the routes, and the ref number correspondent to each route
            that forms the Trans-Canada Highway.</p>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      You could add an alt_name or similar tag.<br>
      <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:BL2PR17MB08045CF0164FA9A4453A7F1FE4AD0@BL2PR17MB0804.namprd17.prod.outlook.com">
        <div class="WordSection1">
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          <p class="MsoNormal">We look forward to hearing your feedback
            and hope to improve the situation together.</p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          <p class="MsoNormal">Here is the link to github ticket that we
            created: <a
              href="https://github.com/TelenavMapping/mapping-projects/issues/57">
https://github.com/TelenavMapping/mapping-projects/issues/57</a> </p>
          <p class="MsoNormal"> <br>
          </p>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      Highway 17 just west of Arnprior has the following tags, which
      looks correct to me:<br>
      <br>
      alt_name=Trans-Canada Highway<br>
      highway=trunk<br>
      lanes=2<br>
      name=Highway 17<br>
      ref=17<br>
      <br>
      Please note some sections of this route will have multiple
      alt_names.  Eg the 401 between Trenton and Toronto will have:<br>
      <br>
      - Highway 401 (primary name)<br>
      - Trans-Canada Highway<br>
      - Macdonald-Cartier Freeway<br>
      - Highway of Heroes<br>
      <br>
      Although I see the existing tags are inconsistent here.<br>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>