<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Andrew,</p>
    <p>Keep up the great work making OSM great for Canada.<br>
    </p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2018-11-27 1:36 p.m., Andrew Lester
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:215742600.243867847.1543343813117.JavaMail.zimbra@shaw.ca">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, helvetica,
        sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">
        <div>I agree. A selective import from CANVEC is fine and
          generally gives good results. As long as you don't import
          things like forests and buildings (which are both woefully
          out-of-date, broken, or outright wrong), there usually isn't a
          problem. However, if someone just importsĀ an entire block of
          data without inspecting it, that's when we run into the
          visible issues that the peanut gallery picks apart.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Andrew<br data-mce-bogus="1">
        </div>
        <div>Victoria, BC<br data-mce-bogus="1">
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__">
        <div data-marker="__HEADERS__"><b>From: </b>"James"
          <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:james2432@gmail.com"><james2432@gmail.com></a><br>
          <b>To: </b>"Andrew" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:andrew.allison@teksavvy.com"><andrew.allison@teksavvy.com></a><br>
          <b>Cc: </b>"talk-ca" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:talk-ca@openstreetmap.org"><talk-ca@openstreetmap.org></a><br>
          <b>Sent: </b>Tuesday, November 27, 2018 9:58:19 AM<br>
          <b>Subject: </b>Re: [Talk-ca] canvec imports<br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__">
          <div dir="auto">not sure why Canvec always gets shat uppon,
            their water features are great and pretty accurate, the
            forest/landcover on the other hand needs fixing before
            import. I think it's clear enough on the canvec wiki page
            that only experienced mappers/importers should attempt a
            canvec import.</div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>