<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head><body style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12pt;"
bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"><div style="font-size:
12pt;font-family: Verdana;">I would concur in general but any import
needs the agreement of local mappers and I think we have to define who
they are first.<br><br>Cheerio John<br><br><span>Danny McDonald wrote on
2019-03-02 7:23 PM:</span><br><blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+DdrqRkHCL1zWCpo6yodSU35xejnduS-UxnppJDqXVztSD9Wg@mail.gmail.com"><div
dir="ltr">Just looking at the data for some random areas, it looks like
the quality is comparable to hand-drawn buildings (but not as good as
most municipal data). There are some weirdly rotated and sized
buildings, as well as some missing buildings, there may be other
problems in areas I haven't examined.<div>A few comments:</div><div>-
The StatsCan data is of better quality, it should be used instead of the
Microsoft data when possible.</div><div>- Existing hand-drawn/imported
buildings should not be replaced by the Microsoft data (except for
CanVec buildings, maybe).</div><div>- In any import, the bigger
provinces should be split into smaller areas (counties or regions)</div><div>DannyMcD</div></div>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</a>
</pre></blockquote><br><div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<div>Sent from <a
href="https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach"><span
style="color: rgb(0, 157, 247);">Postbox</span></a></div></div></div></body></html>