<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>Given the scale of this illicit import (thanks Pierre for the
stats!), I would, yes, stick my neck out and say that I oppose
this action as a Canadian mapper. Contributors who are clearly
violating community norms about discussion and consensus do not
constitute an implicit consensus of some local community. In the
absence of a healthy local discussion about this, I think it's up
to us to say that this needs to stop. <br>
</p>
<p>The tasking manager for this project should be taken down
immediately. Whether they strictly need it to continue or not,
they are (ab)using it and it's clearly helping them continue with
an import that is being actively disputed. <br>
</p>
<div class="moz-signature">Nate Wessel<br>
<span style="font-size:10px;color:#777">Jack of all trades, Master
of Geography, PhD candidate in Urban Planning<br>
<a href="http://natewessel.com">NateWessel.com</a></span>
<br>
<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/15/19 8:28 AM, Jarek Piórkowski
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CACV3h2nVqnhnBa7Aj5UU6PQx1rir3k+PjYZhJFzHg8t2kvR3qw@mail.gmail.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">IMO the huron/hamptonavemapper import is quite clearly in active
disagreement with the import suspension - while I could believe that
one user could overlook clicking on the wiki link in their changeset
messages just once and seeing the bold "on hold", setting up a brand
new similarly named account on February 15, 2019 and immediately
starting to import suggests they know what they're doing. And it's not
like one ultimately _needs_ the tasking manager to insert the data.
The question is what are we going to do about it? Are you going to
speak for Alberta and BC in opposing this import, Nate? That's
defensible but also debatable.
--Jarek
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 21:12, Nate Wessel <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bike756@gmail.com"><bike756@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">
I would suggest, again, that the tasking manager for this import be locked or taken down if that is not possible. One good way to stop people from importing when we don't have consensus is to not make it so easy for them. Indeed, I would find it plausible if these people said they didn't even know the import was paused - their evidence: that the tasking manager is still active!
Best,
Nate Wessel
Jack of all trades, Master of Geography, PhD candidate in Urban Planning
NateWessel.com
On 3/14/19 7:42 PM, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
The changeset comment messages link to the Stats Canada import plan on
the OSM wiki.
I missed it but there were also some edits in Alberta. Quebec edits I
saw were only a couple, outside of Quebec.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/148">http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/148</a> has also been updated, and the
Alberta tasks.
It does raise the point that with a country this large, with editor
community this sparse, there are very few ways to enforce or police a
countrywide consensus, or even arrive at one. Maybe BC mappers like
the import, square angles or no? (Does anyone go to the Metrotown
Meetup?)
--Jarek
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 19:36, john whelan <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jwhelan0112@gmail.com"><jwhelan0112@gmail.com></a> wrote:
Wicked lad importing without an import plan?
Ask him nicely where the import plan for their imports is.
Looks like a new mapper so may not know the rules.
I think currently there are two sets of data that are licensed for import, the Stats Can stuff and the Microsoft stuff. I haven't seen any import plan for the Microsoft stuff but unfortunately it's probably fairly easy to import on the Stats Can side my feeling is we need to work out who the locals are to get buy in since Canada wide there is no consensus on what is acceptable. After a request from a local group then I think that particular area can proceed.
Quebec I think is being organised by Tim.
Thanks John
On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 18:56, Jarek Piórkowski <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jarek@piorkowski.ca"><jarek@piorkowski.ca></a> wrote:
Are people aware that there are buildings being imported by
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/huronavemapper">https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/huronavemapper</a> (most recent 12
hours ago) and <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/hamptonavemapper">https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/hamptonavemapper</a>
(most recent 5 days ago)?
I notice the wiki still says the import is on hold.
Thanks,
--Jarek
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</a>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</a>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>