<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" style="font-family:Verdana; font-size:12pt">
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
Buildings where there is no available municipal data <br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
Sent from Galaxy S7</div>
<br>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> John Whelan <jwhelan0112@gmail.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, March 28, 2019 9:32:32 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Begin Daniel<br>
<b>Cc:</b> Talk-ca; keith hartley<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="font-size:12pt; font-family:Verdana">Are you talking about the older CANVEC data or the data that Stats has released which is really municipal data?<br>
<br>
Thanks John<br>
<br>
<span>Begin Daniel wrote on 2019-03-28 8:31 AM:</span><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<style>
<!--
.EmailQuote
{margin-left:1pt;
padding-left:4pt;
border-left:#800000 2px solid}
-->
</style>
<div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
Someone has compared Bing and Canvec data in rural areas?<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
<div dir="auto" style="direction:ltr; margin:0; padding:0; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:11pt; color:black">
Sent from Galaxy S7</div>
<br>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> OSM Volunteer stevea
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:steveaOSM@softworkers.com"><steveaOSM@softworkers.com></a><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, March 27, 2019 11:52:02 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Talk-ca<br>
<b>Cc:</b> keith hartley<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Talk-ca] Building Import</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt">
<div class="PlainText">Ah, good dialog ensues. Municipality by municipality, in conjunction with BOTH the StatsCan and Bing data, the right things are getting noticed, the right things are getting human-realized at what the next steps are to do. It gets better.<br>
<br>
Yay. Stitch it together. One municipality at a time. One province at a time. Pretty soon, after a few revisions of data and back-and-forths between municipalities and province-wide data checking, you've got something. There, you go.<br>
<br>
SteveA<br>
<br>
> On Mar 27, 2019, at 8:23 PM, keith hartley <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:keith.a.hartley@gmail.com">
<keith.a.hartley@gmail.com></a> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> The patchwork of municipalities is at least useful, before we didn't have a framework for adding this data, but at least we do now thanks to the umbrella license @ Stats Canada. We're a big country with very few, but very skilled OSM mappers (IE gecho111
mapped all of regina's building footprints! ).<br>
> <br>
> I like the concept of the Bing data, but they may have to do another few tries, or maybe retain their Neural network. - Is there anywhere where the Bing data looks nice? I found burbs in Winnipeg not bad, but there's some really weird elements when the source
data is too simple (buildings in the middle of fields) or too complex (urban cores)
<br>
> <br>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 6:29 AM John Whelan <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:jwhelan0112@gmail.com">
<jwhelan0112@gmail.com></a> wrote:<br>
> The Stats Canada data comes from the municipalities. Unfortunately there are over 3,000 in Canada so yes ideally each would be treated separately in reality each municipality doesn't have a group of skilled OSM mappers who are capable of setting up an import
plan and doing the work although there is nothing to stop them doing so.<br>
> <br>
> Cheerio John<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-ca mailing list<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</a><br>
</div>
</span></font><br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset><br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<div>Sent from <a href="https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach">
<span style="color:rgb(0,157,247)">Postbox</span></a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>