<html><body><div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; color: #000000"><div>I just went through and made changeset comments on all of the ones in my area where the user lied about the source, as well as the cases where Google Maps was almost certainly the source. I see that Andy is working on reverting some changesets now, so I won't bother to list all of the ones I commented on (about 30).<br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div>Andrew<br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><div><br data-mce-bogus="1"></div><hr id="zwchr" data-marker="__DIVIDER__"><div data-marker="__HEADERS__"><b>From: </b>"Andy Townsend" <ajt1047@gmail.com><br><b>To: </b>"talk-ca" <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org><br><b>Sent: </b>Thursday, May 5, 2022 1:54:36 PM<br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [Talk-ca] Road name edits in Canada<br></div><div><br></div><div data-marker="__QUOTED_TEXT__">On 05/05/2022 21:45, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-ca wrote:<br>> That is definitely useful! Can you comment on specific changeset comment<br>> where lie is clear?<br><br>See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 for a couple of <br>examples that I've explicitly called out.<br><br>I'll go into more detail in a later list post, and hopefully also <br>address "where we go from here", but for now I'll just concentrate on <br>getting the unverified edits reverted. I'm aware of one has been <br>verified by a later survey (the road names added at <br>https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/120074372 ).<br><br>Best Regards,<br><br>Andy (from the DWG)<br><br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Talk-ca mailing list<br>Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org<br>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca<br></div></div></body></html>