<html><body><div dir="auto">In this case, yes, since there are 2 Sherbrooke Subdivisions, there's CP and SLQ near each other.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto" style="" id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature"><div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container" dir="auto">Otherwise, the operator does not go in the name</div><div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container" dir="auto"><br><hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1"><div id="divRplyFwdMsg" style="font-size: 11pt;" dir="auto"><strong>From:</strong> Clay Smalley <claysmalley@gmail.com><br><strong>Sent:</strong> Sunday, April 30, 2023, 20:10<br><strong>To:</strong> wolfy1339 <webmaster@wolfy1339.com><br><strong>Cc:</strong> talk-ca@openstreetmap.org <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org><br><strong>Subject:</strong> Re: [Talk-ca] Mass retagging for CPKC railroad merger<br></div><br><div dir="auto">Is "CP" or "CPKC" supposed to be in the name? Wouldn't it just be name="Sherbrooke Subdivision", operator=CPKC?<br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 5:27 PM wolfy1339 via Talk-ca <<a href="mailto:talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex">Would it be wise to also replace the `name` when it contains CP as well, <br>
eg: CP Sherbrooke Subdivision -> CPKC Sherbrooke Subdivision, and to <br>
update `reporting_marks` accordingly?<br>
<br>
On 2023-04-30 17:16, Clay Smalley wrote:<br>
> Howdy northern neighbors,<br>
><br>
> The merger between the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern <br>
> railroads is now complete [1], forming a new company named Canadian <br>
> Pacific Kansas City Limited, doing business as CPKC [2]. Since they <br>
> seem to prefer their trade name over their full name in official <br>
> communications, we went ahead and retagged all their trackage in the <br>
> United States with operator=CPKC accordingly [3].<br>
><br>
> Any objections to performing the same mass edit across Canada?<br>
><br>
> [1] <br>
> <a href="https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/cpkc-unveils-new-logo-on-first-day-as-a-merged-system/" rel="noreferrer">https://www.trains.com/trn/news-reviews/news-wire/cpkc-unveils-new-logo-on-first-day-as-a-merged-system/</a> <br>
><br>
> [2] <a href="https://www.cpkcr.com/en-us/about-cpkc" rel="noreferrer">https://www.cpkcr.com/en-us/about-cpkc</a><br>
> [3] <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135352545" rel="noreferrer">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135352545</a><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-ca mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-ca mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
<br></div></div></body></html>