<div dir="ltr">Hi everyone<div><br></div><div style>Do we have a collective opinion about this proposed import circulated by <span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;font-weight:bold;white-space:nowrap"><a href="mailto:stephen.peters1@sky.com">stephen.peters1@sky.com</a> </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;white-space:nowrap">on the talk gb lis</span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;white-space:nowrap">t?</span></div>
<div style><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;white-space:nowrap"><br></span></div><div style><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;white-space:nowrap">Personally I wouldn't want it as I believe we decided not to include ward </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;white-space:nowrap">boundaries as</span></div>
<div style><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;white-space:nowrap">the present cartographic style clutters up and already busy urban map.</span></div><div style><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;white-space:nowrap"><br>
</span></div><div style><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;white-space:nowrap">Regards</span></div><div style><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;white-space:nowrap"><br></span></div>
<div style><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;white-space:nowrap">Brian</span></div><div style><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;white-space:nowrap"><br></span></div><div style>
<br></div></div>