[Talk-GB] MK mapping party
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
ajrlists at googlemail.com
Mon May 18 10:35:40 BST 2009
Tom Hughes wrote:
>Sent: 18 May 2009 10:34 AM
>To: Ed Loach
>Cc: talk-gb at openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] MK mapping party
>Ed Loach wrote:
>>> I did 29 and I think Ollie was doing 28 yesterday, unless he
>>> changed his
>>> mind about what to do?
>> I just had a quick look and Potlatch doesn't show any GPS traces for
>> their area in 28 yet. I did notice you've drawn a way nearby in 29
>> with no tags (I'd guess highway=service?):
>Yep, that should be service. I've fixed it now.
>I also think we need to decide where tertiary should be used, as there's
>quite a difference between different blocks at the moment - most don't
>have any but some have loads.
>My personal opinion was that we should use tertiary for any grid roads
>that aren't primary/secondary and not use it at all within the blocks in
>general - just use unclassified for the more major roads in the blocks.
+1, I was going to raise this today too.
>What do other people think?
>Tom Hughes (tom at compton.nu)
>Talk-GB mailing list
>Talk-GB at openstreetmap.org
More information about the Talk-GB