[Talk-GB] Size - Importance of features - (Was Drinking Map of UK)
richard at systemed.net
Sun Nov 6 18:39:00 GMT 2011
Graham Jones wrote:
> This will inevitably be subjective
So we don't do it. :)
"From a given scenario, a tag/value combination is verifiable if and only if
independent users when observing the same feature would make the same
observation every time."
Lots of ways you can class something like this without resorting to
subjective tags. For example, production in litres per year (reasonably well
documented for the cider industry, at least). You could 'band' it to reduce
the amount of unnecessary detail.
View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Size-Importance-of-features-Was-Drinking-Map-of-UK-tp6968072p6968459.html
Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Talk-GB