<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">The route ref is an interim data level until the relations are added. Think of it as house numbers being initially added as points, and then full building outlines being added at a later stage at which point the building number gets transferred to the building outline.<div><br></div><div>Shaun</div><div><br><div><div>On 24 Mar 2010, at 07:58, Tom Chance wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><p>That all sounds good, though if we add stops to route relations do they really need route_ref?</p><p>Tom<br>
</p><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div><blockquote type="cite">On Mar 23, 2010 10:26 PM, "Christoph Böhme" <<a href="mailto:christoph@b3e.net">christoph@b3e.net</a>> wrote:<br><br>Tom Chance <<a href="mailto:tom@acrewoods.net">tom@acrewoods.net</a>> schrieb:<br><p><font color="#500050">
> On 23 March 2010 13:20, Christoph Boehme <<a href="mailto:christoph@b3e.net">christoph@b3e.net</a>> wrote:
>
> > Well, I just updated t...</font></p>Yes, exactly. My current plan is to have four types of stops in the<br>
basic scheme:<br>
<br>
1. Non-NaPTAN stops: Stops without naptan:*-tags. Basically plain<br>
old OSM bus stops.<br>
2. Unverified NaPTAN stops: Stops from the NaPTAN import which<br>
have a naptan:verified=no tag or which are missing the<br>
highway=bus_stop tag.<br>
3. Verified NaPTAN stops: Stops tagged as hightway=bus_stop and with<br>
either no naptan:verified tag or a naptan:verified=yes tag.<br>
4. CUS-stops: Stops with naptan:BusStopType=CUS because they are not<br>
marked on the ground and cannot be verified.<br>
<br>
Extended schemes would be:<br>
<br>
1. Stops with notes: Highlight stops with a note or naptan:error tag<br>
2. Route information: Highlight stops which are missing the route_ref<br>
tag.<br>
3. Shelter and asset refs: Highlight bus stops which have shelter=yes<br>
and no asset_ref or which have no shelter tag at all (this might be<br>
quite Birmingham specific).<br>
4. Anything else?<br>
<br>
I suggest to keep the old schemes but rename them to the name of the<br>
public transport network they apply to (e.g. "Transport West Midlands"<br>
for Birmingham), since they are based on the amount of information that<br>
is available on the signs used by a particular network.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<font color="#888888">Christoph<br>
</font><p><font color="#500050">
> Best,
> Tom
>
> --
> <a href="http://tom.acrewoods.net/">http://tom.acrewoods.net</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/tom_chance">http://twitter.com/tom_chance</a>
</font></p></blockquote><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder"></div>
_______________________________________________<br>Talk-GB mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>