<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div></div><div> </div><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><p>> Would it better to collect all errors in the catalogue, and then<br>> periodically send them to OS? I know that I would rather receive one<br>> email with 100 actions than 100 emails with 1 action. Or worse,<br>
> multiple emails for the same action.<br>> <br>> It may also help improve the image of OSM by acting in a coordinated manner.<br><br>
</p><p>I agree this would be a good idea. I think also the catalogue should be subdivided according to which release of OS data a particular error is found in - so that effectively, every time there is a new release we start the catalogue again with essentially a clean sheet. Only if an error is still present should it be copied across from a previous version. However for this to work, we'd need to send the contents of the catalogue to OS more frequently than once per release cycle, or else there will be a time lag that leads to unnecessary effort.</p><p><br></p><p>Donald</p>
</div></div><div style="position:fixed"></div>
</div><br>
</body></html>