<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000099">
<br>
On 24/03/2011 15:51, Mike Harris wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4D8B686E.6050608@delco.idps.co.uk" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
Good advice, Andy. I need to make more use of that
"source:designation" key!<br>
<br>
Mike<br>
<br>
On 19:59, SomeoneElse wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:%3C4D8B2A5E.3050509@mail.atownsend.org.uk%3E"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
On 24/03/2011 10:11, Mike Harris wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4D8B18BC.8060206@googlemail.com"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
<br>
<br>
I am not insensitive to the need for OSM to remain free of any
copyright or similar restrictions but I do not think absence
of physical signage <i>ipso facto</i> constitutes such a
barrier to use.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I don't either - but think that a "source:designation" would be
really helpful in those cases where signage isn't obvious (and
not just in the case of ORPAs - if someone's had a look at a
"definitive statement" and identified that's something's a
bridleway (and there's no sign on the ground) it's really useful
to know that.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Andy<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<b>Mike Harris</b></div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<b><i>Mike Harris</i></b></div>
</body>
</html>