<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
    <title></title>
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    As I understand it, there is both a written record of where the
    rights of way go and the definitive map is in addition, with the
    written record taking precedence?<br>
    <br>
    So if a local authority is drawing their map, and it's offset from
    the line of a wall for example from OS MasterMap, as the written
    record might say, then it wouldn't represent the wall, nor be a
    substitute for it, and it could be used independently of the OS
    data. Under the new derived data rules [1], that seems to make it
    free to use.<br>
    <br>
    Copies of the definitive map go to Ordnance Survey and are used to
    piece together the 25K and 50K maps, but I'm told Ordnance Survey
    don't actually digitize it properly, just trace it, they claim not
    to have a vector dataset. <br>
    <br>
    I don't know how local authorities are storing their data, but you
    can be sure they all do it differently. If we could get our hands on
    copies of the definitive map to trace (since the only feature you're
    copying, was put there by the LA, not OS), would that do? <br>
    <br>
    I fear the problem is that even under the exemption process of the
    PSMA, the LAs don't have a dataset per se of PRoWs that they could
    just release, and might not be able to justify making one.<br>
    <br>
    Regards,<br>
    <br>
    Luke<br>
    <br>
    [1] <a
href="http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/business/licences/using-and-creating-data-with-os-products/free-to-use-data/index.html">http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/business/licences/using-and-creating-data-with-os-products/free-to-use-data/index.html</a><br>
    <br>
    On 24/03/2011 12:20, Peter Miller wrote:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:AANLkTi=hc-=798MoThF20Hm-P8JRsbH3VOuZG67wU=8i@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite"><br>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">On 23 March 2011 19:25, TimSC <span
          dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:mapping@sheerman-chase.org.uk">mapping@sheerman-chase.org.uk</a>></span>
        wrote:<br>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
          0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
          padding-left: 1ex;">
          <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
            <div style="font-family: -moz-fixed; font-size: 12px;"
              lang="x-western">Hi
              all,
              <br>
              <br>
              Here is part of an email I sent to a few councils
              regarding rights of
              way data (footpaths, bridleways, etc):
              <br>
              <blockquote type="cite" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"><br>
                I have a big and fairly complicated request regarding
                the definitive
                map. I am interested in making data more accessible to
                the public (as
                encouraged by central government [1]). It would be great
                if the rights
                of way data could be released without restriction,
                specifically the
                definite map. As you probably know, the rights of way
                data is derived
                from Ordnance Survey products which until now has
                prevented this data
                being released without restriction because of copyright.
                However OS
                will soon introduce the Public Sector Mapping Agreement
                which defines
                how government bodies can use OS products [2]. This
                includes a new
                mechanism for public bodies to request datasets that
                have been derived
                from OS products to be release either licensed as "OS
                OpenData" or
                "Free to Use" (section 2.5 of the license [3]). <br>
                [1] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://data.gov.uk/" target="_blank">http://data.gov.uk/</a>
                <br>
                [2] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/business/sectors/government/psma/"
                  target="_blank">http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/business/sectors/government/psma/</a>
                <br>
                [3] <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/business/sectors/government/psma/docs/psma-member-licence.pdf"
                  target="_blank">http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/business/sectors/government/psma/docs/psma-member-licence.pdf</a>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
              Kent County Council wrote back:
              <br>
              <br>
              <blockquote type="cite" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Dear
                Mr
                Sheerman-Chase <br>
                Thank you for your email. <br>
                I will forward your suggestions and comments to the Head
                of the Service <br>
                and Definitive Map Team. <br>
                Kind regards <br>
                Countryside Access Service <br>
                   </blockquote>
              <br>
              Does anyone have any ideas on how to actually get the
              councils to apply
              to OS to exempt their data and release it? Currently, I
              get the
              impression that they don't rate data openness as a high
              priority - they
              just nod and smile until I go away. It would be good to
              get this data
              for quality assurance or even ... dun dun dunnnnn...
              importing. Could
              we start a petition? Or use any contacts the community has
              to make this
              happen? Any other data sets worth liberating?
              <br>
              <br>
              Once we have set a precedent, it should be easier to get
              other councils
              to comply, because of the way the OS exemption process
              works.
              <br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <div><br>
          Technically I believe that the rights of way on the OS mapping
          is derived from the legal documentation provided by the
          council. As it happens I was talking to someone who was in a
          position to know about this recently and he said that the OS
          don't even claim ownership of rights of way data.<br>
          <br>
          Also. my understanding is that Kent are particularly proactive
          on open data. This youtube presentation is worth looking at
          even though it seems to be about their map interface. Clearly
          they are talking the talk on open data.<br>
          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://sparkdev.co.uk/showcase/show/open-kent">http://sparkdev.co.uk/showcase/show/open-kent</a><br>
          <br>
          Here is another link. Carol Patrick seems to be the person to
          talk to.<br>
          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://www.idea.gov.uk/idk/core/page.do?pageId=9274627">http://www.idea.gov.uk/idk/core/page.do?pageId=9274627</a><br>
          <br>
          <br>
          Regards,<br>
          <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          Peter<br>
          <br>
          <br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
          0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
          padding-left: 1ex;">
          <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
            <div style="font-family: -moz-fixed; font-size: 12px;"
              lang="x-western">
              <br>
              Thoughts?
              <br>
              <br>
              Regards, TimSC
              <br>
              <br>
            </div>
          </div>
          <br>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          Talk-GB mailing list<br>
          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb"
            target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>