<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:lucida console,sans-serif;font-size:12pt"><div>>What has been questioned is whether the information that a particular<br>>path has that designation has come from a legitimate unencumbered source<br>.>that we are able to use or whether it has come from sources which are<br>>subject to copyright and/or database right and which hence should not<br>have been used.<br><br>>If the information has been acquired in a legitimate way then I don't<br>>think anybody has a problem with it staying - if it hasn't then it will<br>>need to be removed.<br><br>Unless there is definite evidence that it *has* been taken from an OS map though (innocent until proven guilty, and all that), I think it shouldn't be removed, though I would say that a "source" tag would be helpful. As I said in a previous email, if you have been walking for almost 30 years
you get to know what an "ORPA" looks like. This person could have that prior knowledge/experience.<br><br>Nick<br></div><div style="font-family: lucida console,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><br></font><br></div></div>
</div><br>
</body></html>