<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Thanks, I was able to use <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history">http://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history</a>
browser successfully. It took me 21 minutes to analyse manually but
that could be sped up by putting the declined/undecided/accepted status
next to the user in the first results view, (am emailing author
Langläufer). I guess it should also be possible to build an automated
relation-status viewer fairly easily(?).<br>
<br>
Conclusion: The way was created by an accepted user and tagging is
slightly refined but always by an accepted user. One way has been
added by a declined user ... this is the only tainting.<br>
<br>
Question: Am I right in thinking that a general rule emerges that this
and similar relations can be marked odbl=clean ... member additions are
irrelevant, during a database re-build, the addition of the way is
going to be detached when that way (rather than the relation) is
processed?<br>
<br>
Mike<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history/?type=relation&ref=34269">http://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history/?type=relation&ref=34269</a><br>
<br>
Richard (accepted) created the relation:<br>
<br>
created_by=Potlatch 0.10c (later deleted by an accepted contributor)<br>
name=Lon Las Cymru (name changed later by an accepted contributor)<br>
network=ncn<br>
ref=8<br>
route=bicycle<br>
type=route<br>
<br>
Paul Martin (declined) added way <a
href="http://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history/?type=way&ref=27681863">27681863</a><br>
<br>
<br>
On 09/01/2012 20:54, Steve Brook wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:000e01cccf08$749595b0$5dc0c110$@tiscali.co.uk"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">You could try using the OSM History Browser to list the change sets and
allow you to compare selected changes.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history/">http://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history/</a>
I got this from the Route Relations 'h' link on the
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_Kingdom_Long_Distance_">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_Kingdom_Long_Distance_</a>
Paths page will provide the relation number and take you straight there:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history/?type=relation&ref=63872">http://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history/?type=relation&ref=63872</a>
Also The Deep Diff tool may be of use (linked from the OSM Inspector licence
change view)
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://osm.mapki.com/history/">http://osm.mapki.com/history/</a>
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Andy [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:andy2.0@gmail.com">mailto:andy2.0@gmail.com</a>]
Sent: 09 January 2012 17:47
To: Michael Collinson
Cc: OSM talk-gb
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] GB License Change Readiness
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Does anyone know of a way to see just the tagging history of the
relation itself?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
JOSM can reliably show the full history of a relation, even one with many
versions (such as 34269).
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> At the moment I have no clue as what proportion are routes (ugh!) and
what are building multi-polygons and relatively easy to remap.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Hopefully many of them are turn restrictions and boundaries, which should
also be relatively easy to sort out.
Andy
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>